Paper detail

Determination of the number of participating nucleons in p+p interactions at SPS energies

In the past the analyses of inelastic p+p collision for example in terms of the hadron gas model have assumed that always both protons participate in the interaction. In this article we show that (at sqrt(s) = 17.3 GeV ) on average only 1,89 protons are interacting. Measurements of the mean multiplicities of protons, neutrons, charged pions, charged kaons and Λ hyperons allow to compute the number of initial state nucleons using conservation of baryon number, strangeness, and isospin. We further argue that once the number of initial state nucleons is given and the mean multiplicities of protons and charged pions are known in p+p interactions at center-of-mass energies below a few tens of GeV, the yields of net neutrons, kaons, and hyperons can be estimated with a precision of a few percent using again baryon and isospin conservation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.