Paper detail

Determination of the $m_u$ and $m_d$ quark masses from $η\to 3π$ decay

For a precise determination of the m_u and m_d quark masses, it is useful to combine isospin symmetric results of lattice or sum rules QCD techniques with some isospin breaking study performed in chiral perturbation theory (ChPT). The most promising process for the later is $η\to 3π$ decay. However, this process is affected by large chiral corrections and there are observed discrepancies between the values of Dalitz plot parameters stemming from the standard ChPT computation of its amplitude and those experimentally measured. We describe here the method based on analytic dispersive representation which attempts to obtain the information on the masses by taking this discrepancy into account independently of its exact origin. Together with the results of this analysis we present a review of some other constraints on the light quark masses and conclude with values of the masses compatible with them.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.