Paper detail

Determination of the Form Factors for the Decay B0 -> D*- l+ nu_l and of the CKM Matrix Element |V_cb|

We present a combined measurement of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element |V_{cb}| and of the parameters rho^2, R_1(1), and R_2(1), which fully characterize the form factors for the B0 -> D*- l+ nu_l decay in the framework of heavy-quark effective theory. The results, based on a selected sample of about 52,800 B0 -> D*- l+ nu_l decays, recorded by the BaBar detector, are rho2=1.157+-0.094+-0.027, R_1(1)=1.327+-0.131+-0.043, R_2(1)=0.859+-0.077+-0.021, and F(1)|V_cb|=(34.7+-0.4+-1.0)x10^-3. The first error is the statistical and the second is the systematic uncertainty. Combining these measurements with the previous BaBar measurement of the form factors, which employs a different fit technique on a partial sample of the data, we improve the statistical precision of the result, rho2=1.191+-0.048+-0.028, R_1(1)=1.429+-0.061+-0.044, R_2(1)=0.827+-0.038+-0.022, and F(1)|V_cb| = (34.4+-0.3+-1.1)x10^-3. Using lattice calculations for the axial form factor $\mathcal{F}(1)$, we extract |V_cb| =(37.4+-0.3+-1.2+1.2-1.4)x10^-3, where the third error is due to the uncertainty in F(1). We also present a measurement of the exclusive branching fraction, B = (4.69+-0.04+-0.34)%.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.