Paper detail

Determination of stellar parameters of C-rich hydrostatic stars from spectro-interferometric observations

Giant stars, and especially C-rich giants, contribute significantly to the chemical enrichment of galaxies. The determination of precise parameters for these stars is a necessary prerequisite for a proper implementation of this evolutionary phase in the models of galaxies. Infrared interferometry opened new horizons in the study of the stellar parameters of giant stars, and provided new important constraints for the atmospheric and evolutionary models.We aim to determine which stellar parameters can be constrained by using infrared interferometry and spectroscopy, in the case of C-stars what is the precision which can be achieved and what are the limitations. For this purpose we obtained new infrared spectra and combined them with unpublished interferometric measurements for five mildly variable carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch stars. The observations were compared with a large grid of hydrostatic model atmospheres and with new isochrones which include the predictions of the thermally pulsing phase. For the very first time we are able to reproduce spectra in the range between 0.9 and 4 $μ$m, and $K$ broad band interferometry with hydrostatic model atmospheres. Temperature, mass, log$(g)$, C/O and a reasonable range for the distance were derived for all the objects of our study. All our targets have at least one combination of best-fitting parameters which lays in the region of the HR-diagram where C-stars are predicted. We confirm that low resolution spectroscopy is not sensitive to the mass and log$(g)$ determination. For hydrostatic objects the $3\,μ$m feature is very sensitive to temperature variations therefore it is a very powerful tool for accurate temperature determinations. Interferometry can constrain mass, radius and log$(g)$ but a distance has to be assumed. The large uncertainty in the distance measurements available for C-rich stars remains a major problem.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.