Paper detail

Determination of Starspot Covering Fraction as a function of Stellar Age from Observational Data

The association of starspots with magnetic fields leads to an expectation that quantities which correlate with magnetic field strength may also correlate with {starspot} coverage. Since younger stars spin faster and are more magnetically active, assessing whether {starspot} coverage correlates with shorter rotation periods and stellar youth tests these principles. Here we analyze the {starspot} covering fraction versus stellar age for M{-}, G{-}, K{-}, and F{-}type stars based on previously determined variability and rotation periods of over 30,000 {\textit{Kepler}} main-sequence stars. We determine the correlation between age and variability using single and dual power law best fits. We find that {starspot} coverage does indeed decrease with age. Only when the data {are} binned in an effort to remove the effects of activity cycles of individual stars, do statistically significant power law fits emerge for each stellar type. {Using bin averages,} we then find that the {starspot} covering fraction scales with the {X}-ray to bolometric ratio to the power $λ$ with {$0.22\pm 0.03 < λ< 0.32\pm 0.09$} for {G-type} stars of rotation period below 15 days and for the full range of F{-} and M{-type} stars. For K{-}type stars, we find two branches of $λ$ separated by variability bins, with the lower branch showing nearly constant starspot coverage and the upper branch {$λ\sim 0.35\pm 0.04$.} G{-}type stars with periods longer than $15$ days exhibit a transition to steeper power law of {$ λ\sim 2.4 \pm 1.0$.} The potential connection to previous rotation-age measurements suggesting a magnetic breaking transition at the solar age, corresponding to period of $24.5$ is also of interest.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.