Paper detail

Determination of Polarization Angles in CMB Experiments and Application to CMB Component Separation Analyses

The new generation of CMB polarization experiments will reach limits of sensitivity never achieved before to detect the primordial B-mode signal. However, all these efforts will be futile if we lack a tight control of systematics. Here, we focus on the systematic that arises from the uncertainty on the calibration of polarization angles. Miscalibrated polarization angles induce a mixing of E- and B-modes that obscures the primordial B-mode signal. We introduce an iterative angular power spectra maximum likelihood-based method to calculate polarization angles from the multi-frequency signal. The basis behind this methodology grounds on nulling the EB power spectra. To simplify the likelihood, we assume that the rotation angles are small (<6 deg) and, the maximum likelihood solution for the rotation angles is obtained by applying an iterative process where the covariance matrix does not depend on the angles per iteration, i.e., the rotation angles are fixed to the estimated angles in the previous iteration. With these assumptions, we obtain an analytical linear system which leads to a very fast computational implementation. We show that with this methodology we are able to determine the rotation angle for each frequency with sufficiently good accuracy. To prove the latter point we perform component separation analyses using the parametric component separation method B-SeCRET with two different approaches. In the first approach we apply the B-SeCRET pipeline to the signal de-rotated with the estimation of the angles, while in the second, the rotation angles are treated as model parameters using the estimation of the angles as a prior information. We obtain that the rotation angles estimations improve after applying the second approach, and show that the systematic residuals due to the non-null calibration polarization angles are mitigated to the order of a 1% at the power spectrum level.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.