Paper detail

Determination of neutrino mass ordering in future $^{76}$Ge-based neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments

Motivated by recent intensive experimental efforts on searching for neutrinoless double-beta decays, we perform a detailed analysis of the physics potential of the experiments based on $^{76}\mathrm{Ge}$. Assuming no signals, current and future experiments could place a $90\%$ lower limit on the half life $T^{0ν}_{1/2} \gtrsim 4\times 10^{26}~{\rm yr}$ and $T^{0ν}_{1/2} \gtrsim 7\times 10^{27}~{\rm yr}$, respectively. Then, how to report an evidence for neutrinoless double-beta decays is addressed by following the Bayesian statistical approach. For the first time, we present a quantitative description of experimental power to distinguish between normal and inverted neutrino mass orderings. Taking an exposure of $10^{4}~{\rm kg}\cdot{\rm yr}$ and a background rate of $10^{-4}~{\rm counts}/({\rm keV}\cdot{\rm kg}\cdot{\rm yr})$, we find that a moderate evidence for normal neutrino mass ordering (i.e., with a Bayes factor ${\cal B}$ given by $\ln({\cal B}) \simeq 2.5$ or a probability about $92.3\%$ according to the Jeffreys scale) can be achieved if the true value of effective neutrino mass $m^{}_{ββ}$ turns out to be below $0.01~{\rm eV}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.