Paper detail

Determination of impact parameter in high-energy heavy-ion collisions via deep learning

In this study, Au+Au collisions with the impact parameter of $0 \leq b \leq 12.5$ fm at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV are simulated by the AMPT model to provide the preliminary final-state information. After transforming these information into appropriate input data (the energy spectra of final-state charged hadrons), we construct a deep neural network (DNN) and a convolutional neural network (CNN) to connect final-state observables with impact parameters. The results show that both the DNN and CNN can reconstruct the impact parameters with a mean absolute error about $0.4$ fm with CNN behaving slightly better. Then, we test the neural networks for different beam energies and pseudorapidity ranges in this task. It turns out that these two models work well for both low and high energies. But when making test for a larger pseudorapidity window, we observe that the CNN shows higher prediction accuracy than the DNN. With the method of Grad-CAM, we shed light on the `attention' mechanism of the CNN model.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.