Paper detail

Determination of HII region metallicity in the context of estimating the primordial helium abundance

The primordial $^4$He abundance (Y$_p$) is one of the key characteristics of Primordial Nucleosynthesis processes that occurred in the first minutes after the Big Bang. Its value depends on the baryon/photon ratio $η\equiv n_b/n_γ$, and is also sensitive to the relativistic degrees of freedom which affect the expansion rate of the Universe at the radiation-dominated era. The most used method of the determination of Y$_p$ is the study of the metal deficient HII regions located in blue compact dwarf galaxies (BCDs). In this paper, we discuss in detail various methods of the determination of HII region metallicity in the context of Y$_p$ analyses. We show that some procedures used in the methods lead to biases in the metallicity estimates and underestimation of their uncertainties. We propose a modified method for the metallicity determination, as well as an additional criterion for selecting objects. We have selected 69 objects (26 objects with high quality spectra from the HeBCD+NIR database and 43 objects from the SDSS catalog), for which we estimate Y and O/H using the proposed method. We have estimated Y$_p=0.2470\pm0.0020$ which is one of the most accurate estimates obtained up to date. Its comparison with the value Y$_p=0.2470\pm0.0002$ obtained as a result of numerical modelling of Primordial Nucleosynthesis with the value of $Ω_b$ taken from the analysis of the CMB anisotropy (Planck mission), is an important tool for studying the self-consistency of the Standard cosmological model (a possible discrepancy between these estimates could be an indicator of a new physics). The application of the proposed method allows one to more correctly estimate Y$_p$ and the slope $d$Y/$d$(O/H). Further analysis of the data from the SDSS catalog can significantly increase the statistics of objects for the regression analysis, which in turn can refine the Y$_p$ estimate.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.