Paper detail

Determination of Cosmological Parameters from Gamma Ray Burst Characteristics and Afterglow Correlations

We use the correlation relation between the energy emitted by the GRBs in their prompt phases and the X-ray afterglow fluxes, in an effort to constrain cosmological parameters and aiming to construct a Hubble diagram at high redshifts, i.e. beyond those found with Type Ia supernovae. We use a sample of 126 \textit{Swift} GRBs, that we have selected among more than 800 long bursts observed until April 2015. The selection is based on a few observational constraints: GRB flux higher than 0.4 $photons/cm^2/s$ in the band 15-150 keV, spectrum fitted with simple power law, redshift accurately known and given, and X-ray afterglow observed and flux measured. The statistical method of maximum likelihood is then used to determine the best cosmological parameters ($Ω_M$, $Ω_Λ$) that give the best correlation for two relations: a) the Amati relation (between intrinsic spectral peak energy $E_{p,i}$ and the equivalent isotropic energy), b) the Dainotti relation, namely between the X-ray afterglow luminosity $L_X$ and the break time $T_a$, which is observed in the X-ray flux FX. Although the number of GRBs with high redshifts is rather small, and despite the notable dispersion found in the data, the results we have obtained are quite encouraging and promising. The results obtained using the Amati relation are close to those obtained using the Type Ia supernovae, and they appear to indicate a universe dominated by dark energy. However, those obtained with the correlation between the break time and the X-ray afterglow luminosity is consistent with the findings of the WMAP study of the cosmic microwave background radiation, and they seem to indicate a de Sitter-Einstein universe dominated by matter.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.