Paper detail

Detections of X-ray emissions from Type Ia Supernova 2003lx

We present a study of a young (few years old) supernova remnant 2003lx which was first discovered in X-ray through two serendipitous Swift observations in 2008 January and the corresponding merged image revealed a 7σsource detection at $2.1\pm1.2$ arcsec (0.9 +/- 0.5 Swift pixels) from the optical position of the supernova. The X-ray luminosity $L_x = 4.8_{-1.7}^{+1.8} \times 10^{41} erg/s of band 0.3 - 2.0 keV is estimated by a redshift z = 0.0377 power law which can infer a companion star with a mass-loss rate of \dot{M} ~ 10^{-4} M_\sun per year (with assumption of wind velocity v_w = 10 km/s) in the white dwarf binary system. Thermal Model fitting suggests the temperature of the shock wave front is kT ~ 0.4 keV which is consistent with the typical reverse shock temperate. The X-ray emission allows us to probe the interaction between the fast moving debris of the exploded star and the circumstellar medium (CSM). This in turns provides footprints of the mass-loss history of the exploded system, and may allow us to learn about the nature of the progenitor and its companion.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.