Paper detail

Detection of Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-scale Structure

We report a detection of the coherent distortion of faint galaxies arising from gravitational lensing by foreground structures. This ``cosmic shear'' is potentially the most direct measure of the mass power spectrum, as it is unaffected by poorly-justified assumptions made concerning the biasing of the distribution. Our detection is based on an initial imaging study of 14 separated 8' x 16' fields observed in good, homogeneous conditions with the prime focus EEV CCD camera of the 4.2m William Herschel Telescope. We detect an rms shear of 1.6% in 8' x 8' cells, with a significance of 3.4 sigma. We carefully justify this detection by quantifying various systematic effects and carrying out extensive simulations of the recovery of the shear signal from artificial images defined according to measured instrument characteristics. We also verify our detection by computing the cross-correlation between the shear in adjacent cells. Including (gaussian) cosmic variance, we measure the shear variance to be (0.016)^2 plus/minus (0.012)^2 plus/minus (0.006)^2, where these 1 sigma errors correspond to statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Our measurements are consistent with the predictions of cluster-normalised CDM models (within 1 sigma) but a COBE-normalised SCDM model is ruled out at the 3.0 sigma level. For the currently-favoured Lambda-CDM model (with Omega_m = 0.3), our measurement provides a normalisation of the mass power spectrum of sigma_8 = 1.5 plus/minus 0.5, fully consistent with that derived from cluster abundances. Our result demonstrates that ground-based telescopes can, with adequate care, be used to constrain the mass power spectrum on various scales. The present results are limited mainly by cosmic variance, which can be overcome in the near future with more observations.

preprint2000arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.