Paper detail

Detection of Strong Evolution in the Population of Early-Type Galaxies

The standard picture holds that giant elliptical galaxies formed in a single burst at high redshift. Aging of their stellar populations subsequently caused them to fade and become redder. The Canada-France Redshift Survey provides a sample of about 125 galaxies with the luminosities and colours of passively evolving giant ellipticals and with 0.1 < z < 1. This sample is inconsistent with the standard evolutionary picture with better than 99.9% confidence. The standard Schmidt test gives <V/V_{max}> = 0.398 when restricted to objects with no detected star formation, and <V/V_{max}> = 0.410 when objects with emission lines are also included. A smaller sample of early-type galaxies selected from tha Hawaii Deep Survey gives equally significant results. With increasing redshift a larger and larger fraction of the nearby elliptical and S0 population must drop out of of the sample, either because the galaxies are no longer single units or because star formation alters their colours. If the remaining fraction is modelled as F=(1+z)^{-γ}, the data imply gamma = 1.5 +- 0.3. At z=1 only about one third of bright E and S0 galaxies were already assembled and had the colours of old passively evolving systems. We discuss the sensitivity of these results to the incompleteness corrections and stellar population models we have adopted. We conclude that neither is uncertain enough to reconcile the observations with the standard picture. Hierarchical galaxy formation models suggest that both merging and recent star formation play a role in the strong evolution we have detected.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.