Paper detail

Detection of selective sweeps in cattle using genome-wide SNP data

The domestication and subsequent selection by humans to create breeds of cattle undoubtedly altered the patterning of variation within their genomes. Strong selection to fix advantageous large-effect mutations underlying domesticability, breed characteristics or productivity created selective sweeps in which variation was lost in the chromosomal region flanking the selected allele. Selective sweeps have been identified in the genomes of many species including humans, dogs, horses, and chickens. We attempt to identify regions of the bovine genome that have been subjected to selective sweeps. Two datasets were used for the discovery and validation of selective sweeps via the fixation of alleles at a series of contiguous SNP loci. BovineSNP50 data were used to identify 28 putative sweep regions among 14 cattle breeds. Affymetrix BOS 1 prescreening assay data for five breeds were used to identify 114 regions and validate 5 regions identified using the BovineSNP50 data. Many genes are located within these regions; however, phenotypes that we predict to have historically been under strong selection include horned-polled, coat color, stature, ear morphology, and behavior. The identified selective sweeps represent recent events associated with breed formation rather than ancient events associated with domestication. No sweep regions were shared between indicine and taurine breeds reflecting their divergent selection histories. A primary finding of this study is the sensitivity of results to assay resolution. Despite the bias towards common SNPs in the BovineSNP50 design, false positive sweep regions appear to be common due to the limited resolution of the assay. This assay design bias leads to the detection of breed-specific sweep regions, or regions shared by a small number of breeds, restricting the suite of selected phenotypes detected to primarily those associated with breed characteristics.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.