Paper detail

Detection of Gamma-Rays above 1.5 TeV from Mkn 501

A detection of TeV $γ$-rays from Mkn 501 is reported, based on observations made between March and August 1996 with the first HEGRA Cherenkov telescope (CT1). From the image analysis, 351 excess candidate $γ$-ray events are obtained from the 147 h dataset. The statistical significance of the excess is 5.2 $σ$. The average excess rate is $2.4 \pm 0.5$ h$^{-1}$ above the $\approx$ 1.5 TeV threshold of CT1. Under the assumption that the spectrum of Mkn 501 follows a power law we find a differential spectral index of 2.6$\pm0.5$ and obtain a time-averaged integral flux above 1.5 TeV of $2.3 (\pm0.4)_{Stat} (+1.5-0.6)_{Syst} \times 10^{-12}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$. Comparison with our near contemporary observations of the Crab Nebula, used as a standard candle to test CT1 after upgrading to a 127 pixel camera, indicates that Mkn 501 has a spectrum similar to that of the Crab Nebula above 1.5 TeV. The integral flux above 1.5 TeV from Mkn 501 is found to have been between 2.2 and 3.6 times smaller than that from the Crab Nebula. HEGRA is the second experiment to have detected Mkn 501 in the TeV range.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.