Paper detail

Detection of Doctored Speech: Towards an End-to-End Parametric Learn-able Filter Approach

The Automatic Speaker Verification systems have potential in biometrics applications for logical control access and authentication. A lot of things happen to be at stake if the ASV system is compromised. The preliminary work presents a comparative analysis of the wavelet and MFCC-based state-of-the-art spoof detection techniques developed in these papers, respectively (Novoselov et al., 2016) (Alam et al., 2016a). The results on ASVspoof 2015 justify our inclination towards wavelet-based features instead of MFCC features. The experiments on the ASVspoof 2019 database show the lack of credibility of the traditional handcrafted features and give us more reason to progress towards using end-to-end deep neural networks and more recent techniques. We use Sincnet architecture as our baseline. We get E2E deep learning models, which we call WSTnet and CWTnet, respectively, by replacing the Sinc layer with the Wavelet Scattering and Continuous wavelet transform layers. The fusion model achieved 62% and 17% relative improvement over traditional handcrafted models and our Sincnet baseline when evaluated on the modern spoofing attacks in ASVspoof 2019. The final scale distribution and the number of scales used in CWTnet are far from optimal for the task at hand. So to solve this problem, we replaced the CWT layer with a Wavelet Deconvolution(WD) (Khan and Yener, 2018) layer in our CWTnet architecture. This layer calculates the Discrete-Continuous Wavelet Transform similar to the CWTnet but also optimizes the scale parameter using back-propagation. The WDnet model achieved 26% and 7% relative improvement over CWTnet and Sincnet models respectively when evaluated over ASVspoof 2019 dataset. This shows that more generalized features are extracted as compared to the features extracted by CWTnet as only the most important and relevant frequency regions are focused upon.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.