Paper detail

Detection of distinct power spectra in soft and hard X-ray bands in the hard state of GRS 1915+105

The well-known black hole X-ray binary GRS 1915+105 is a unique source in the sense that it cannot be classified within the standard picture of black hole binary states. In this work we study archival XMM-Newton observations taken between 2003 and 2004 of the \c{hi} variability class of GRS 1915+105, which corresponds to the hard state in the standard black hole X-ray binary state classification. The crucial point of our study is that by using XMM-Newton data we can access the variability below 3 keV, an energy range that is not covered with RXTE. We focus on the study of the power spectral shape in the soft and hard X-ray band, in light of our work done with Swift on MAXI J1659-152. In the hard band (above 2.5 keV) power density spectra consist of band-limited noise and quasi-periodic oscillations, corresponding to the power spectral shape seen in the hard or intermediate state, while in the soft band the averaged power density spectrum is consistent with a power-law noise, corresponding to the power spectral shape usually seen in the soft state. The coexisting of two different power spectral shapes in the soft and hard band, where the soft band power spectrum is dominated by a power-law noise, is consistent with MAXI J1659-152, and confirms the energy dependence of power spectral states. Our additional spectral analysis shows that the disc component does contribute to the soft band flux. These findings support that the observed black hole power spectral state depends on which spectral component we are looking at, which implies that power spectral analysis is probably a more sensitive method than spectral modeling to trace the emergence of the disc component in the hard or intermediate state.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.