Paper detail

Detection of Diffuse Neutral Intragroup Medium in Hickson Compact Groups

We present new Green Bank Telescope (GBT) 21 cm neutral hydrogen (HI) observations of a complete distance limited sample of 22 Hickson Compact Groups (HCGs) with at least four true members. We detected an average HI mass of $8 \times 10^{9} M_{\odot}$ (median= $6\times 10^{9} M_{\odot}$), which is significantly larger than previous single-dish measurements. Consequently, the HI-deficiencies for these HCGs have been reduced, although not completely eliminated. Spectral comparison of the GBT data with complementary Very Large Array (VLA) data shows significant HI excess in the GBT spectra. The observed excess is primarily due to the high surface brightness sensitivity of the GBT detecting diffuse, low column density HI in these groups. The excess gas forms a faint diffused neutral medium which is an intermediate stage in the evolution of high-surface brightness HI tidal debris in the intra-group medium (IGM) before it is fully ionized. The excess gas mass fraction (ratio of excess HI to total HI) for our complete sample varies from 5% to 81% with an average of 36% (median=30%). The excess gas mass fraction is highest in slightly HI deficient groups where the tidal debris has had enough time to evolve. We also find the excess gas content increases with the evolutionary phase of the group described in Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2001. Theoretical calculations indicate that an HI cloud of radius >200 pc would survive in an IGM of 2 million Kelvin for more than the typical dynamical lifetime of a group. However, smaller clouds get evaporated and assimilated into the hot IGM in a much shorter timescale.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.