Paper detail

Detection of Cosmic Structures using the Bispectrum Phase. I. Mathematical Foundations

Many low-frequency radio interferometers are aiming to detect very faint spectral signatures from structures at cosmological redshifts, particularly of neutral Hydrogen using its characteristic 21 cm spectral line. Due to the very high dynamic range needed to isolate these faint spectral fluctuations from the very bright foregrounds, spectral systematics from the instrument or the analysis, rather than thermal noise, are currently limiting their sensitivity. Failure to achieve a spectral calibration with fractional inaccuracy $\lesssim 10^{-5}$ will make the detection of the critical cosmic signal unlikely. The bispectrum phase from interferometric measurements is largely immune to this calibration issue. We present a basis to explore the nature of bispectrum phase in the limit of small spectral fluctuations. We establish that they measure the intrinsic dissimilarity in the transverse structure of the cosmic signal relative to the foregrounds, expressed as rotations in the underlying phase angle. Their magnitude is related to the strength of the cosmic signal relative to the foregrounds. Using a range of sky models, we detail the behavior of bispectrum phase fluctuations using standard Fourier-domain techniques and find it comparable to existing approaches, with a few key differences. Mode-mixed foreground contamination is more pronounced than in existing approaches because the bispectrum phase is a product of three individual interferometric phases. The multiplicative coupling of foregrounds in the bispectrum phase fluctuations results in the mixing of foreground signatures with that of the cosmic signal. We briefly outline a variation of this approach to avoid extensive mode-mixing. Despite its limitations, the interpretation of results using bispectrum phase is possible with forward-modeling. Importantly, it is an independent and a viable alternative to existing approaches.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.