Paper detail

Detection boundary and Higher Criticism approach for rare and weak genetic effects

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many genetic factors underlying complex human traits. However, these factors have explained only a small fraction of these traits' genetic heritability. It is argued that many more genetic factors remain undiscovered. These genetic factors likely are weakly associated at the population level and sparsely distributed across the genome. In this paper, we adapt the recent innovations on Tukey's Higher Criticism (Tukey [The Higher Criticism (1976) Princeton Univ.]; Donoho and Jin [Ann. Statist. 32 (2004) 962-994]) to SNP-set analysis of GWAS, and develop a new theoretical framework in large-scale inference to assess the joint significance of such rare and weak effects for a quantitative trait. In the core of our theory is the so-called detection boundary, a curve in the two-dimensional phase space that quantifies the rarity and strength of genetic effects. Above the detection boundary, the overall effects of genetic factors are strong enough for reliable detection. Below the detection boundary, the genetic factors are simply too rare and too weak for reliable detection. We show that the HC-type methods are optimal in that they reliably yield detection once the parameters of the genetic effects fall above the detection boundary and that many commonly used SNP-set methods are suboptimal. The superior performance of the HC-type approach is demonstrated through simulations and the analysis of a GWAS data set of Crohn's disease.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.