Paper detail

Detection and Detectability of Intermittent Faults Based on Moving Average T2 Control Charts with Multiple Window Lengths

So far, problems of intermittent fault (IF) detection and detectability have not been fully investigated in the multivariate statistics framework. The characteristics of IFs are small magnitudes and short durations, and consequently traditional multivariate statistical methods using only a single observation are no longer effective. Thus in this paper, moving average T^2 control charts (MA-TCCs) with multiple window lengths, which simultaneously employ a bank of MA-TCCs with different window lengths, are proposed to address the IF detection problem. Methods to reduce false/missing alarms and infer the IFs' appearing and disappearing time instances are presented. In order to analyze the detection capability for IFs, definitions of guaranteed detectability are introduced, which is an extension and generalization of the original fault detectability concept focused on permanent faults (PFs). Then, necessary and sufficient conditions are derived for the detectability of IFs, which may appear and disappear several times with different magnitudes and durations. Based on these conditions, some optimal properties of two important window lengths are further discussed. In this way, a theoretical framework for the analysis of IFs' detectability is established as well as extended discussions on how the theoretical results can be adapted to real-world applications. Finally, simulation studies on a numerical example and the continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) process are carried out to show the effectiveness of the developed methods.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.