Paper detail

Detection and characterization of planets orbiting oscillating red-giant stars with NASA's TESS mission

Driven largely by multiple ground-based radial-velocity (RV) surveys and photometric space missions such as Kepler and K2, the discovery of new exoplanets has increased rapidly since the early 2000s. However, due to a target selection bias in favor of main-sequence stars, only a handful of transiting planets have been found orbiting evolved hosts. These planets, most of which are giants, hold important information regarding the formation and evolution of planetary systems. In this thesis, I sought to increase the sample of known giant planets orbiting red-giant stars, focusing on data from NASA's Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission, and to improve their characterization. Specifically, I focused on close-in giant planets orbiting (preferably) oscillating low-luminosity red-giant branch (LLRGB) stars. To improve characterization, I developed a method to model planetary transits and stellar signals simultaneously, implementing Gaussian processes to model stellar granulation and the oscillations envelope in the time domain. My results show that the model enables time-domain asteroseismology, inferring the frequency of maximum oscillation amplitude, $ν_\text{max}$, to within 1\%. The method's implementation is open-source and available to the community. Regarding the planet search, I assembled a pipeline, mostly comprised of third-party open-source software and explored a sample of $\sim$40,000 bright LLRGB stars in the southern hemisphere of TESS's field of view. The search identified four planet candidates, two of which are not currently known planets and orbit red-giant stars. Radial-velocity follow-up observations of both these candidates have tentatively confirmed their planetary nature. Finally, I also confirmed the planetary nature of an additional candidate, not part of the above sample, through RV observations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.