Paper detail

Detecting the tensor-to-scalar ratio with the pure pseudospectrum reconstruction of $B$-mode

In this work we employ the pure-pseudo formalism devised to minimise the effects of the leakage on the variance of power spectrum estimates and discuss the limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio, $r$, that could be realistically set by current and forthcoming measurements of the $B$-mode angular power spectrum. We compare those with the results obtained using other approaches: naïve mode-counting, minimum-variance quadratic estimators, and re-visit the question of optimizing the sky coverage of small-scale, suborbital experiments in order to maximize the statistical significance of the detection of $r$. We show that the optimized sky coverage is largely insensitive to the adopted approach at least for reasonably compact sky patches. We find, however, that the mode-counting overestimates the detection significance by a factor $\sim1.17$ as compared to the lossless maximum variance approach and by a factor $\sim1.25$ as compared to the lossy pure pseudo-spectrum estimator. In a second time, we consider more realistic experimental configurations. With a pure pseudospectrum reconstruction of $B$-modes and considering only statistical uncertainties, we find that a detection of $r\sim0.11$, $r\sim0.0051$ and $r\sim0.0026$ at 99$\%$ of confidence level is within the reach of current sub-orbital experiments, future arrays of ground-based telescopes and a satellite mission, respectively. This means that an array of telescopes could be sufficient to discriminate between large- and small-field models of inflation, even if the $E$-to-$B$ leakage is consistently included but accounted for in the analysis. However, a satellite mission will be required to distinguish between different small-field models depending on the number of e-folds.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.