Paper detail

Detecting the periodicity of highly irregularly sampled light-curves with Gaussian processes: the case of SDSSJ025214.67-002813.7

Based on a 20-year-long multiband observation of its light-curve, it was conjectured that the quasar SDSSJ025214.67-002813.7 has a periodicity of ~4.4 years. These observations were acquired at a highly irregular sampling rate and feature long intervals of missing data. In this setting, the inference over the light-curve's spectral content requires, in addition to classic Fourier methods, a proper model of the probability distribution of the missing observations. In this article, we address the detection of the periodicity of a light-curve from partial and irregularly-sampled observations using Gaussian processes, a Bayesian nonparametric model for time series. This methodology allows us to evaluate the veracity of the claimed periodicity of the abovementioned quasar and also to estimate its power spectral density. Our main contribution is the confirmation that considering periodic component definitely improves the modeling of the data, although being the source originally selected by a large sample of objects, the possibility that this is a chance result cannot be ruled out.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.