Paper detail

Detecting Lyman Alpha Emitters in the Sub-millimeter

Using the results from a previously developed Lyman Alpha/continuum production/transmission and dust enrichment model for Lyman Alpha Emitters (LAEs), based on cosmological SPH simulations, we assess the detectability of their dust-reprocessed sub-millimeter (submm) radiation. As supernovae (rather than evolved stars) control dust formation and destruction processes, LAEs are relatively dust-poor with respect to local galaxies: they have low dust-to-gas ratios (0.05 times the dust-to-gas ratio of the Milky Way) in spite of their relatively high metallicity, which is approximately 10-50% of the solar value. Using the derived escape fraction of ultraviolet (UV) continuum photons we compute the UV luminosity absorbed by dust and re-emitted in the far infrared. The LAE submm fluxes correlate with their Lyman Alpha luminosity: about (3%, 1%) at z=(5.7, 6.6) of the LAEs in our simulated sample (those with with Log L_α> 43.1) would have fluxes at 850 micrometer (the optimal band for detection) in excess of 0.12 mJy and will be therefore detectable at 5 sigma with ALMA with an integration time of only 1 hour. Such detections would open a new window on the physical conditions prevailing in these most distant galaxies.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.