Paper detail

Detecting hidden uncertainties in standard candles and clocks via improved hypothesis test

Tiny systematic uncertainty caused by cosmological hypotheses is hard to be detected, not only because the present observational errors are relatively large but also because hypothesis-induced uncertainty is indistinguishable from other sources of systematic errors. We introduce an efficient and sensitive method for detecting tiny systematic errors, which contain the cosmological-hypothesis-induced uncertainty and other secondary systematic errors, hidden behind residuals of chi-square analysis. In this paper, we apply our analysis to JLA compilation of SN Ia observations and latest cosmic chronometer data-set. We find slight but noticeable evolutional feature in residuals of chi-square analysis under present systematic uncertainty control, when combining JLA samples with standard cosmological model. Meanwhile, cosmic chronometer observation has no noticeable similar feature with various cosmological models, which may be covered up by relatively large observational uncertainties. Our method can be useful when various independent observational samples with high observational precision are available, since the cosmological hypothesis-induced error appears unbiasedly in all related data-sets.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.