Paper detail

Detecting Galactic MACHOs with VERA through Astrometric Microlensing of Distant Radio Sources

In this paper we investigate the properties of astrometric microlensing of distant radio sources (QSOs and radio galaxies) due to MACHOs, and discuss their implications for VERA (VLBI Exploration of Radio Astrometry). First we show that in case of astrometric microlensing of distant sources, the event duration is only a function of the lens mass and tangential velocity, but independent of the lens distance, in contrast to the well-known three-fold degeneracy for photometric microlensing. Moreover, the lens mass $M$ is scaled by the tangential velocity $v_\perp$ as $M\propto v_\perp$, rather than $M\propto v_\perp^2$ which is the case for photometric microlensing. Thus, in astrometric microlensing the dependence of the lens mass on the unknown parameter $v_\perp$ is weaker, indicating that the duration of astrometric microlensing event is a better quantity to study the mass of lensing objects than that of photometric microlensing. We also calculate the optical depth and event rate, and show that within 20$^\circ$ of the galactic center a typical event rate for 10 $μ$as-level shift is larger than $2.5 \times 10^{-4}$ event per year, assuming that a quarter of the halo is made up with MACHOs. This indicates that if one monitors a few hundred sources for $\sim$20 years, such an astrometric microlensing event is detectable. Since a typical event duration is found to be fairly long (5 to 15 years), the frequency of the monitoring observation can be relatively low, i.e., once per six months, which is rather reasonable for practical observations. We discuss practical strategy for observing astrometric microlensing with VERA, and argue that an astrometric microlensing event due to MACHOs can be detected by VERA within a few decades.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.