Paper detail

Detecting Cognitive Appraisals from Facial Expressions for Interest Recognition

Interest makes one hold her attention on the object of interest. Automatic recognition of interest has numerous applications in human-computer interaction. In this paper, we study the facial expressions associated with interest and its underlying and closely related components, namely, curiosity, coping potential, novelty and complexity. To this end, we conducted an experiment in which participants watched images and micro-videos while a front-facing camera recorded their expressions. After watching each item they self-reported their level of interest, curiosity, coping potential and perceived novelty and complexity. Using an automated method, we tracked facial action units (AU) and studied the relationship between the presence of facial movements with interest and its related components. We then tracked the facial landmarks, e.g., corners of lips, and extracted features from each response. We trained random forests regression models to detect the level of interest, curiosity, and appraisals. We found a large difference between the way people report and react to interesting visual content. The expressions in response to images and micro-videos were not always pronounced depending on the participants. This makes the direct detection of interest from facial expressions a challenging problem. With this work, for the first time, we demonstrate the feasibility of detecting cognitive appraisals from facial expressions which will open the door for appraisal-driven emotion recognition methods.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.