Paper detail

Detailed properties of gravitational-wave mergers from flyby perturbations of wide binary black holes in the field

Wide black hole binaries (wide-BBHs; $\geqslant 10^3$ AU) in the field can be perturbed by random stellar flybys that excite their eccentricities. Once a wide binary is driven to a sufficiently small pericenter approach, gravitational wave (GW) emission becomes significant, and the binary inspirals and merges. In our previous study, using simplified models for wide-BBHs, we found that successive flybys lead to significant merger fractions of wide-BBHs in less than Hubble time, making the flyby perturbation mechanism a relevant contributor to the production rate of GW-sources. However, the exact rates and detailed properties of the resulting GW sources depend on the wide binary progenitors. In this paper we use detailed population synthesis models for the initial wide-BBH population, considering several populations corresponding to different natal-kick models and metallicities, and then follow the wide-BBHs evolution due to flyby perturbations and GW-emission. We show that the cumulative effect of flybys is conductive for the production of GW sources in non-negligible rates of $1-20$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$, which are sensitive to the natal kicks model. Such rates are relevant to the observationally inferred rate. Our models, now derived from detailed population of binaries, provide the detailed properties of the produced GW-sources, including mass-functions and delay times. The GW mergers are circularized when enter the aLIGO band; have a preference for high velocity dispersion host galaxies (in particular ellipticals); have a relatively uniform delay-time distribution; and likely have mildly correlated (less than isolated evolution channels and more than dynamical channels) prograde spin-spin and spin-orbits.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.