Paper detail

Detailed analysis of prolate quadratures and interpolation formulas

As demonstrated by Slepian et. al. in a sequence of classical papers, prolate spheroidal wave functions (PSWFs) provide a natural and efficient tool for computing with bandlimited functions defined on an interval. As a result, PSWFs are becoming increasing popular in various areas in which such function occur - this includes physics (e.g. wave phenomena, fluid dynamics), engineering (e.g. signal processing, filter design), etc. To use PSWFs as a computational tool, one needs fast and accurate numerical algorithms for the evaluation of PSWFs and related quantities, as well as for the construction of quadratures, interpolation formulas, etc. Even though, for the last half a century, substantial progress has been made in design of such algorithms, the complexity of many of the existing algorithms, however, is at least quadratic in the band limit $c$. For example, the evaluation of the $n$th eigenvalue of the prolate integral operator requires at least $O(c^2)$ operations. Therefore, while the existing algorithms are quite satisfactory for moderate values of $c$ (e.g. $c \leq 10^3$), they tend to be relatively slow when $c$ is large (e.g. $c \geq 10^4$). In this paper, we describe several numerical algorithms for the evaluation of PSWFs and related quantities, and design a class of PSWF-based quadratures for the integration of bandlimited functions. Also, we perform detailed analysis of the related properties of PSWFs. While the analysis is somewhat involved, the resulting numerical algorithms are quite simple and efficient in practice. For example, the evaluation of the $n$th eigenvalue of the prolate integral operator requires $O(n+c)$ operations; also, the construction of related accurate quadrature rules requires $O(c)$ operations. Our results are illustrated via several numerical experiments.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.