Paper detail

Designing weights for quartet-based methods when data is heterogeneous across lineages

Homogeneity across lineages is a common assumption in phylogenetics according to which nucleotide substitution rates remain constant in time and do not depend on lineages. This is a simplifying hypothesis which is often adopted to make the process of sequence evolution more tractable. However, its validity has been explored and put into question in several papers. On the other hand, dealing successfully with the general case (heterogeneity across lineages) is one of the key features of phylogenetic reconstruction methods based on algebraic tools. The goal of this paper is twofold. First, we present a new weighting system for quartets (ASAQ) based on algebraic and semi-algebraic tools, thus specially indicated to deal with data evolving under heterogeneus rates. This method combines the weights two previous methods by means of a test based on the positivity of the branch length estimated with the paralinear distance. ASAQ is statistically consistent when applied to GM data, considers rate and base composition heterogeneity among lineages and does not assume stationarity nor time-reversibility. Second, we test and compare the performance of several quartet-based methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction (namely, Quartet Puzzling, Weight Optimization and Wilson's method) in combination with ASAQ weights and other weights based on algebraic and semi-algebraic methods or on the paralinear distance. These tests are applied to both simulated and real data and support Weight Optimization with ASAQ weights as a reliable and successful reconstruction method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.