Paper detail

Designing low-cost TaC virtual substrates for $Al_xGa_{1-x}N$ epitaxy

$Al_xGa_{1-x}N$ is a critical ultra-wide bandgap material for optoelectronics, but the deposition of thick, high quality epitaxial layers has been hindered by a lack of lattice-matched substrates. Here we identify the (111) face of transition metal carbides as a suitable class of materials for substrates lattice matched to (0001) $Al_xGa_{1-x}N$ and demonstrate the growth of thin film TaC which has an effective hexagonal lattice constant matched to $Al_{0.45}Ga_{0.55}N$. We explore growth conditions for sputtered TaC on sapphire substrates and investigate the effects of sputter power, layer thickness and incident plasma angle on film structure and in- and out-of-plane strain. We then show critical improvements to film quality by annealing films in a face-to-face configuration at 1600 $^\circ$C, which significantly reduces full width at half max (FWHM) of in- and out-of-plane diffraction peaks and results in a step-and-terrace surface morphology. This work presents a path toward electrically conductive, lattice matched, thermally compatible substrates for $Al_xGa_{1-x}N$ heteroepitaxy, a critical step for vertical devices and other power electronics applications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.