Paper detail

Design principles of noise-induced oscillation in biochemical reaction networks: II. coupled positive and negative feedback loops

According to the chemical reaction network theory, the topology of a certain class of chemical reaction networks, regardless of the kinetic details, sets a limit on the dynamical properties that a particular network can potentially admit; the structure of a network predetermines the dynamic capacity of the network. We note that stochastic fluctuations can possibly confer a new dynamical capability to a network. Thus, it is of tremendous value to understand and be able to control the landscape of stochastic dynamical behaviors of a biochemical reaction network as a function of network architecture. Here we investigate such a case where stochastic fluctuations can give rise to the new capability of noise-induced oscillation in a subset of biochemical reaction networks, the networks with only three biochemical species whose reactions are governed by mass action kinetics and with the coupling of positive and negative feedback loops. We model the networks with the master equations and approximate them, using the linear noise approximation. For each network, we read the signal-to-noise ratio value, an indicator of amplified and coherent noise-induced oscillation, off from the analytically derived power spectra. We classify the networks into three performance groups based on the average values of the signal-to-noise ratio and the robustness. We identify the common network architecture among the networks belonging to the same performance group, from which we learn that the coupling of negative and positive feedback loops generally enhance the noise-induced oscillation performance better than the negative feedback loops alone. The performance of networks also depends on the relative size of the positive and negative feedback loops; the networks with the bigger positive and smaller negative feedbacks are much worse oscillators than the networks with only negative feedback loops.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.