Paper detail

Design principles governing the motility of myosin V

The molecular motor myosin V exhibits a wide repertoire of pathways during the stepping process, which is intimately connected to its biological function. The best understood of these is hand-over-hand stepping by a swinging lever arm movement toward the plus-end of actin filaments, essential to its role as a cellular transporter. However, single-molecule experiments have also shown that the motor "foot stomps", with one hand detaching and rebinding to the same site, and backsteps under sufficient load. Explaining the complete taxonomy of myosin V's load-dependent stepping pathways, and the extent to which these are constrained by motor structure and mechanochemistry, are still open questions. Starting from a polymer model, we develop an analytical theory to understand the minimal physical properties that govern motor dynamics. In particular, we solve the first-passage problem of the head reaching the target binding site, investigating the competing effects of load pulling back at the motor, strain in the leading head that biases the diffusion in the direction of the target, and the possibility of preferential binding to the forward site due to the recovery stroke. The theory reproduces a variety of experimental data, including the power stroke and slow diffusive search regimes in the mean trajectory of the detached head, and the force dependence of the forward-to-backward step ratio, run length, and velocity. The analytical approach yields a formula for the stall force, identifying the relative contributions of the chemical cycle rates and mechanical features like the bending rigidities of the lever arms. Most importantly, by fully exploring the design space of the motor, we predict that myosin V is a robust motor whose dynamical behavior is not compromised by reasonable perturbations to the reaction cycle, and changes in the architecture of the lever arm.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.