Paper detail

Design of Spatially Coupled LDPC Codes over GF(q) for Windowed Decoding

In this paper we consider the generalization of binary spatially coupled low-density parity-check (SC-LDPC) codes to finite fields GF$(q)$, $q\geq 2$, and develop design rules for $q$-ary SC-LDPC code ensembles based on their iterative belief propagation (BP) decoding thresholds, with particular emphasis on low-latency windowed decoding (WD). We consider transmission over both the binary erasure channel (BEC) and the binary-input additive white Gaussian noise channel (BIAWGNC) and present results for a variety of $(J,K)$-regular SC-LDPC code ensembles constructed over GF$(q)$ using protographs. Thresholds are calculated using protograph versions of $q$-ary density evolution (for the BEC) and $q$-ary extrinsic information transfer analysis (for the BIAWGNC). We show that WD of $q$-ary SC-LDPC codes provides significant threshold gains compared to corresponding (uncoupled) $q$-ary LDPC block code (LDPC-BC) ensembles when the window size $W$ is large enough and that these gains increase as the finite field size $q=2^m$ increases. Moreover, we demonstrate that the new design rules provide WD thresholds that are close to capacity, even when both $m$ and $W$ are relatively small (thereby reducing decoding complexity and latency). The analysis further shows that, compared to standard flooding-schedule decoding, WD of $q$-ary SC-LDPC code ensembles results in significant reductions in both decoding complexity and decoding latency, and that these reductions increase as $m$ increases. For applications with a near-threshold performance requirement and a constraint on decoding latency, we show that using $q$-ary SC-LDPC code ensembles, with moderate $q>2$, instead of their binary counterparts results in reduced decoding complexity.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.