Paper detail

Design of Robust, Protograph Based LDPC Codes for Rate-Adaptation via Probabilistic Shaping

In this work, the design of robust, protograph-based low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes for rate-adaptive communication via probabilistic shaping is considered. Recently, probabilistic amplitude shaping (PAS) by Böcherer et al. has been introduced for capacity approaching and rate-adaptive communication with a bitwise-demapper and binary decoder. Previous work by the authors considered the optimization of protograph based LDPC codes for PAS and specific spectral efficiencies (SEs) to jointly optimize the LDPC code node degrees and the mapping of the coded bits to the bit-interleaved coded modulation (BICM) bit-channels. We show that these codes tend to perform poor when operated at other rates and propose the design of robust LDPC codes by employing a min-max approach in the search for good protograph ensembles via differential evolution. The considered design uses a single 16 amplitude-shift-keying (ASK) constellation and a robust 13/16 rate LDPC code to operate between 0.7 to 2.7 bits per channel use. For a blocklength of 16224 bits and a target frame error rate of 1e-3 the proposed code operates within 1.32 dB of continuous AWGN capacity for 0.7 to 1.3 bpcu and within 1.05 dB for 1.3 bpcu to 2.7 bpcu.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.