Paper detail

Design of a Near-Ideal Fault-Tolerant Routing Algorithm for Network-on-Chip-Based Multicores

With relentless CMOS technology downsizing Networks-on-Chips (NoCs) are inescapably experiencing escalating susceptibility to wearout and reduced reliability. While faults in processors and memories may be masked via redundancy, or mitigated via techniques such as task migration, NoCs are especially vulnerable to hardware faults as a single link breakdown may cause inter-tile communication to halt indefinitely, rendering the whole multicore chip inoperable. As such, NoCs impose the risk of becoming the pivotal point of failure in chip multicores that utilize them. Aiming towards seamless NoC operation in the presence of faulty links we propose Hermes, a near-ideal fault-tolerant routing algorithm that meets the objectives of exhibiting high levels of robustness, operating in a distributed mode, guaranteeing freedom from deadlocks, and evening-out traffic, among many. Hermes is a limited-overhead deadlock-free hybrid routing algorithm, utilizing load-balancing routing on fault-free paths to sustain high-throughput, while providing pre-reconfigured escape path selection in the vicinity of faults. Under such online mechanisms, Hermes's performance degrades gracefully with increasing faulty link counts, a crucially desirable response lacking in prior-art. Additionally, Hermes identifies non-communicating network partitions in scenarios where faulty links are topologically densely distributed such that packets being routed to physically isolated regions cause no network stagnation due to indefinite chained blockages starting at sub-network boundaries. An extensive experimental evaluation, including utilizing traffic workloads gathered from full-system chip multi-processor simulations, shows that Hermes improves network throughput by up to $3\times$ when compared against the state-of-the-art. Further, hardware synthesis results prove Hermes's efficacy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.