Paper detail

Description of the minimizers of least squares regularized~ with~ $\bm{\ell_0}$-norm. Uniqueness of the global minimizer

We have an $\m\x\n$ real-valued arbitrary matrix $A$ (e.g. a dictionary) with $\m<\n$ and data $d$ describing the sought-after object with the help of $A$. This work provides an in-depth analysis of the (local and global) minimizers of an objective function $\Fd$ combining a quadratic data-fidelity term and an $\ell_0$ penalty applied to each entry of the sought-after solution, weighted by a regularization parameter $\be>0$. For several decades, this objective has attracted a ceaseless effort to conceive algorithms approaching a good minimizer. Our theoretical contributions, summarized below, shed new light on the existing algorithms and can help the conception of innovative numerical schemes. To solve the normal equation associated with any $\m$-row submatrix of $A$ is equivalent to compute a local minimizer $\hu$ of $\Fd$. (Local) minimizers $\hu$ of $\Fd$ are strict if and only if the submatrix, composed of those columns of $A$ whose indexes form the support of $\hu$, has full column rank. An outcome is that strict local minimizers of $\Fd$ are easily computed without knowing the value of $\be$. Each strict local minimizer is linear in data. It is proved that $\Fd$ has global minimizers and that they are always strict. They are studied in more details under the (standard) assumption that $\rank(A)=\m<\n$. The global minimizers with $\m$-length support are seen to be impractical. Given $d$, critical values $\be_\k$ for any $\k\leq\m-1$ are exhibited such that if $\be>\be_\k$, all global minimizers of $\Fd$ are $\k$-sparse. An assumption on $A$ is adopted and proved to fail only on a closed negligible subset. Then for all data $d$ beyond a closed negligible subset, the objective $\Fd$ for $\be>\be_\k$, $\k\leq\m-1$, has a unique global minimizer and this minimizer is $\k$-sparse. Instructive small-size ($5\x 10$) numerical illustrations confirm the main theoretical results.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.