Paper detail

Deriving the cosmic ray spectrum from gamma-ray observations

A fundamental problem of cosmic ray (CR) physics is the determination of the average properties of Galactic CRs outside the Solar system. Starting from COS-B data in the 1980's, gamma-ray observations of molecular clouds in the Gould Belt above the Galactic plane have been used to deduce the Galactic CR energy spectrum. We reconsider this problem in view of the improved precision of observational data which in turn require a more precise treatment of photon production in proton-proton scatterings. We show that the spectral shape $dN/dp\propto p^{-2.85}$ of CR protons as determined by the PAMELA collaboration in the energy range 80 GeV<pc<230 GeV is consistent with the photon spectra from molecular clouds observed with Fermi-LAT down to photon energies E\sim 1-2 GeV. Adding a break of the CR flux at 3 GeV, caused by a corresponding change of the diffusion coefficient, improves further the agreement in the energy range 0.2-3 GeV.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.