Paper detail

Deriving Photometric Redshifts using Fuzzy Archetypes and Self-Organizing Maps. II. Comparing Sampling Techniques Using Mock Data

In a companion paper, we proposed combining large numbers of "fuzzy archetypes" with Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs) to derive photometric redshifts in a data-driven way. In this paper, we investigate the performance of several sampling approaches that build on this general idea using a mock catalog designed to approximately simulate LSST ($ugrizY$) and Euclid ($YJH$) data from $z=0-6$ at fixed LSST $Y=24$ mag. We test eight different approaches: two brute-force methods, two Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based methods, two hierarchical sampling methods, and two "quick-search" methods based on quantities derived during the initial SOM training process. We find most methods perform reasonably well with small catastrophic outlier fractions and are able to robustly identify redshift probability distribution functions that are multi-modal and/or poorly constrained. Once these insecure objects are removed, the results are generally in good agreement with the strict accuracy requirements necessary to meet Euclid weak lensing goals for most redshifts above $z \sim 0.8$. These results demonstrate the utility of our data clustering-based approach and highlight its effectiveness to derive quick and accurate photo-z's using large numbers of templates.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.