Paper detail

Deriving a Simple Gradual Security Language

Abstracting Gradual Typing (AGT) is an approach to systematically deriving gradual counterparts to static type disciplines. The approach consists of defining the semantics of gradual types by interpreting them as sets of static types, and then defining an optimal abstraction back to gradual types. These operations are used to lift the static discipline to the gradual setting. The runtime semantics of the gradual language then arises as reductions on gradual typing derivations. To demonstrate the flexibility of AGT, we gradualize $λ_\text{SEC}$, the prototypical security-typed language, with respect to only security labels rather than entire types, yielding a type system that ranges gradually from simply-typed to securely-typed. We establish noninterference for the gradual language, called $λ_{\widetilde{\text{SEC}}}$, using Zdancewic's logical relation proof method. Whereas prior work presents gradual security cast languages, which require explicit security casts, this work yields the first gradual security source language, which requires no explicit casts.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.