Paper detail

Derivations, generic formal fibers and bad Noetherian rings

We consider a circle of ideas involving differential algebra, local Noetherian rings, and their generic formal fibers. Connecting these ideas gives rise to what we term a "twisted" subring $R$ of a ring $S$. Each such subring $R$ arises as a pullback of a derivation taking values in an $S$-module $K$. The twisting relationship proves to be a kind of inversion of Nagata idealization: whereas idealization extends $S$ to the larger ring $S \star K$, twisting produces a subring of $S$ which behaves much like the ring $S \star K$. The rings produced in this manner exhibit pathological features, such as failing to have finite normalization, but in spite of this they are quite tractable and conceptually (if not practically) easy to locate, and in this way provide a rich but manageable source of non-standard Noetherian rings. The theory developed to support this construction involves extensive use of both Noetherian and non-Noetherian commutative ring theory, as well as differential algebra.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.