Paper detail

Derivation of the relativistic "proper-time" quantum evolution equations from Canonical Invariance

Based on 1) the spectral resolution of the energy operator; 2) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum Hermitian operators; 3) the definition of conjugate coordinate-momentum variables in classical mechanics; and 4) the fact that the physical point in phase space remains unchanged under (canonical) transformations between one pair of conjugate variables to another, we are able to show that <t_s|E_s>, the proper-time rest-energy transformation matrices, are given as a*exp[-iE_s t_s/\hbar], from which we obtain the proper-time rest -energy evolution equation i\hbar{\partial/\partial t_s} |Psi>= \hat{E_s}|Psi>. For special relativistic situations this equation can be reduced to the usual i\hbar{\partial/\partial t}|Psi>=\hat{E}|Psi> dynamical equations, where t is the &#34;reference time&#34; and E is the total energy. Extension of these equations to accelerating frames is then provided.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.