Paper detail

Derivation of Symmetric PCA Learning Rules from a Novel Objective Function

Neural learning rules for principal component / subspace analysis (PCA / PSA) can be derived by maximizing an objective function (summed variance of the projection on the subspace axes) under an orthonormality constraint. For a subspace with a single axis, the optimization produces the principal eigenvector of the data covariance matrix. Hierarchical learning rules with deflation procedures can then be used to extract multiple eigenvectors. However, for a subspace with multiple axes, the optimization leads to PSA learning rules which only converge to axes spanning the principal subspace but not to the principal eigenvectors. A modified objective function with distinct weight factors had to be introduced produce PCA learning rules. Optimization of the objective function for multiple axes leads to symmetric learning rules which do not require deflation procedures. For the PCA case, the estimated principal eigenvectors are ordered (w.r.t. the corresponding eigenvalues) depending on the order of the weight factors. Here we introduce an alternative objective function where it is not necessary to introduce fixed weight factors; instead, the alternative objective function uses squared summands. Optimization leads to symmetric PCA learning rules which converge to the principal eigenvectors, but without imposing an order. In place of the diagonal matrices with fixed weight factors, variable diagonal matrices appear in the learning rules. We analyze this alternative approach by determining the fixed points of the constrained optimization. The behavior of the constrained objective function at the fixed points is analyzed which confirms both the PCA behavior and the fact that no order is imposed. Different ways to derive learning rules from the optimization of the objective function are presented. The role of the terms in the learning rules obtained from these derivations is explored.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.