Dependence of XCOX_{\rm CO} on metallicity, intensity, and spatial scale in a self-regulated interstellar medium

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

We study the CO(1-0)-to-H2_2 conversion factor (XCOX_{\rm CO}) and the line ratio of CO(2-1)-to-CO(1-0) (R21R_{21}) across a wide range of metallicity (0.1≤Z/Z⊙≤30.1 \leq Z/Z_\odot \leq 3) in high-resolution (~0.2 pc) hydrodynamical simulations of a self-regulated multiphase interstellar medium. We construct synthetic CO emission maps via radiative transfer and systematically vary the "observational" beam size to quantify the scale dependence. We find that the kpc-scale XCOX_{\rm CO} can be over-estimated at low ZZ if assuming steady-state chemistry or assuming that the star-forming gas is H2_2-dominated. On parsec scales, XCOX_{\rm CO} varies by orders of magnitude from place to place, primarily driven by the transition from atomic carbon to CO. The pc-scale XCOX_{\rm CO} drops to the Milky Way value of 2×1020 cm−2 (K km s−1)−12\times 10^{20}\ {\rm cm^{-2}~(K~km~s^{-1})^{-1}} once dust shielding becomes effective, independent of ZZ. The CO lines become increasingly optically thin at lower ZZ, leading to a higher R21R_{21}. Most cloud area is filled by diffuse gas with high XCOX_{\rm CO} and low R21R_{21}, while most CO emission originates from dense gas with low XCOX_{\rm CO} and high R21R_{21}. Adopting a constant XCOX_{\rm CO} strongly over- (under-)estimates H2_2 in dense (diffuse) gas. The line intensity negatively (positively) correlates with XCOX_{\rm CO} (R21R_{21}) as it is a proxy of column density (volume density). On large scales, XCOX_{\rm CO} and R21R_{21} are dictated by beam averaging, and they are naturally biased towards values in dense gas. Our predicted XCOX_{\rm CO} is a multivariate function of ZZ, line intensity, and beam size, which can be used to more accurately infer the H2_2 mass.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.