Paper detail

Dependence of the flux of gamma-ray pulsars on distance: A nonparametric analysis of the data in the second FERMI catalogue

Pulsars' gamma-ray luminosities are thought to exceed their radio luminosities by several orders of magnitude: a notion that is based on the assumption that the decay with distance of the flux of gamma-ray pulses obeys the inverse-square law as does that of the flux of radio pulses. However, results of testing the hypothesis of independence of luminosities and distances of gamma-ray pulsars by means of the Efron--Petrosian statistic imply that the observational data in the second {\it FERMI} catalogue are consistent with the dependence $S\propto D^{-3/2}$ of the flux densities $S$ of these pulsars on their distances $D$ at substantially higher levels of significance than they are with the dependence $S\propto D^{-2}$. This is not incompatible with the requirements of the conservation of energy because the radiation process described in Ardavan [{\it Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.}, {\bf 507}, 4530--4563 (2021)], by which the superluminally moving current sheet in the magnetosphere of a neutron star is shown to generate the observed gamma-ray pulses, is intrinsically transient: the difference in the fluxes of power across any two spheres centred on the star is balanced by the change with time of the energy contained inside the shell bounded by those spheres. Once the over-estimation of their values is rectified, the luminosities of gamma-ray pulsars turn out to have the same range of values as do the luminosities of radio pulsars.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.