Paper detail

Density profile slope in Dwarfs and environment

In the present paper, we study how the dark matter density profiles of dwarfs galaxies in the mass range $10^8-10^{10} M_{\odot}$ are modified by the interaction of the dwarf in study with the neighboring structures, and by changing baryon fraction in dwarfs. As already shown in Del Popolo (2009), the slope of density profile of inner halos flattens with decreasing halo mass and the profile is well approximated by a Burkert's profile. The analysis shows that dwarfs who suffered a smaller tidal torquing (consequently having smaller angular momentum) are characterized by steeper profiles with respect to dwarfs subject to higher torque, and similarly dwarfs having a smaller baryons fraction have also steeper profiles than those having a larger baryon fraction. In the case tidal torquing is shut down and baryons are not present, the density profile is very well approximated by an Einasto profile, similarly to dwarfs obtained in dissipationless N-body simulations. We then apply the result of the previous analysis to the dark matter halo rotation curves of three different dwarfs, namely NGC 2976, known to have a flat inner core, NGC 5949 having a profile intermediate between a cored and a cuspy one, and NGC 5963 having a cuspy profile. After calculating baryon fraction, which is $\simeq 0.1$ for the three galaxies, we fitted the rotation curves changing the value of angular momentum. NGC 2976, has an higher value of ordered angular momentum ($λ\simeq 0.04$) with respect to NGC 5949 ($λ\simeq 0.025$) and in the case of NGC 5963 the very steep profile can be obtained with a low value of $λ$ ($λ\simeq 0.02$) and also decreasing the value of the random angular momentum. In the case of NGC 2976 tidal interaction with M81 could have also influenced the inner part of the density profile.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.