Paper detail

Density profile evolution during prestellar core collapse: Collapse starts at the large scale

We study the gravitationally-dominated, accretion-driven evolution of a prestellar core. In our model, as the core&#39;s density increases, it remains immersed in a constant-density environment and so it accretes from this environment, increasing its mass and reducing its Jeans length. Assuming a power-law density profile $ρ\propto r^{-p}$, we compute the rate of change of the slope $p$, and show that the value $p=2$ is stationary, and furthermore, an attractor. The radial profile of the Jeans length scales as $r^{p/2}$, implying that, for $p<2$, there is a radius below which the region is smaller than its Jeans length, thus appearing gravitationally stable and in need of pressure confinement, while, in reality, it is part of a larger-scale collapse and is undergoing compression by the infalling material. In this region, the infall speed decreases towards the center, eventually becoming subsonic, thus appearing &#34;coherent&#34;, without the need for turbulence dissipation. We present a compilation of observational determinations of density profiles in dense cores and show that the distribution of their slopes peaks at $p \sim 1.7$--1.9, supporting the notion that the profile steepens over time. Finally, we discuss the case of magnetic support in a core in which the field scales as $B \propto ρ^β$. For the expected value of $β= 2/3$, this implies that the mass to magnetic flux ratio also decreases towards the central parts of the cores, making them appear magnetically supported, while in reality they may be part of larger collapsing supercritical region. We conclude that local signatures of either thermal or magnetic support are not conclusive evidence of stability, that the gravitational instability of a region must be established at the large scales, and that the prestellar stage of collapse is dynamic rather than quasistatic.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.