Paper detail

Density of Binary Disc Packings: Playing with Stoichiometry

We consider hard-disc mixtures with disc sizes within ratio $\sqrt{2}-1$, that is, the small disc exactly fits in the hole between four large discs. For each prescribed stoichiometry of large and small discs, the densest packings are rigorously determined via a computer-assisted proof. The density is maximal for the 1:1 stoichiometry: the large discs then form a square grid in each interstitial site of which a small disc nests. When there is an excess of large discs, the densest packings are made of a single phase which mixes the two types of discs in a chaotic way (it can be described by square-triangle tilings). When there is an excess of small discs, on the contrary, a phenomenon of phase separation appears: the large discs are involved in the densest 1:1 stoichiometry phases while the excess of small discs form compact hexagonal phases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.