Paper detail

Density analysis for estimating the degree of on-site correlation on transition-metal atoms in extended systems

In the context of the modified Becke-Johnson (mBJ) potential, we recently underlined that $\bar{g}$, the average of $\left\vert\nablaρ\right\vert/ρ$ in the unit cell, has markedly different values in transition-metal oxides and pure transition metals [Tran et al., J. Appl. Phys. 126, 110902 (2019)]. However, since $\bar{g}$ is a constant it is not able to provide local information about a particular atom in the system. Furthermore, while $\overline{g}$ can be used only for periodic bulk solids, a local (i.e., position-dependent) version would allow us to consider also low-dimensional systems and interfaces. Such a local function has been proposed by Rauch et al. [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 2654 (2020)] for the local mBJ potential. Actually, a local version of $\overline{g}$, or of another similar quantity like the reduced density gradient $\overline{s}$, could also be used in the framework of other methods. Here, we explored the idea to use such a local function $\tilde{g}$ (or $\tilde{s}$), defined as the average of $g$ (or $s$) over a certain region around a transition-metal atom, to estimate the degree of on-site correlation on this atom. We found a large difference in our correlation estimators between non-correlated and correlated materials, proving its usefulness and reliability. Our estimators can subsequently be used to determine whether or not a Hubbard $U$ on-site correction in the DFT+$U$ method should be applied to a particular atom. This is particularly interesting in cases where the degree of correlation of the transition-metal atoms is not clear, like interfaces between correlated and non-correlated materials or oxygen-covered metal surfaces. In such cases, our estimators could also be used for an interpolation of $U$ between correlated and non-correlated atoms.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.